<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Urbin Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbintechnology.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbintechnology.com</link>
	<description>Technology notes by Mark Urbin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kindle Fire Review by Shiela</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/12/27/kindle-fire-review/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.wordpress.com/?p=511#comment-689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice job on your review of the Kindle Fire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job on your review of the Kindle Fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Switchblade Drone by BScCollateral</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/10/21/switchblade-drone/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BScCollateral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=509#comment-687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s interesting technology. 

Didn&#039;t SJ Game&#039;s &quot;Ogre&quot; state that the battlefield had been seeded with drones like this, explaining why there were no hidden movement rules?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting technology. </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t SJ Game&#8217;s &#8220;Ogre&#8221; state that the battlefield had been seeded with drones like this, explaining why there were no hidden movement rules?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Chatbots collide by BScCollateral</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/09/11/when-chatbots-collide/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BScCollateral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=506#comment-686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What strikes me most about this is the following (paraphrased) exchange:

MALE: I&#039;m great.
FEMALE: Are you good?
MALE: I&#039;m good. I already said that.
FEMALE: I don&#039;t think you did.

These are two instances of the same program. Note that they started off saying exactly the same thing, and then started to converse. But what happened here? Why do they disagree? I can only imagine three explanations:

a) The Male instance &quot;understands&quot; that &quot;Great&quot; and &quot;Good&quot; are synonymous in this context, but the Female instance does not. Why? [And yeah, the two terms are not strictly synonyms, but still. If someone says &quot;I feel good&quot; it makes sense to ask &quot;But do you feel great?&quot; However, if someone says &quot;I feel great&quot; it makes no sense to ask &quot;do you feel good?&quot;]

b) Neither instance equates &quot;Great&quot; and &quot;Good&quot; in context. The chatbot throws in &quot;I already said that&quot; at random, and it happened to fit when the male said it.

c) The chatbot will sometimes &quot;forget&quot; a part of the conversation previously made.

Not knowing anything about how they&#039;re programmed, I really have no idea. But isn&#039;t it neat that two identically programmed chatbots will disagree about the contents of their own conversation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strikes me most about this is the following (paraphrased) exchange:</p>
<p>MALE: I&#8217;m great.<br />
FEMALE: Are you good?<br />
MALE: I&#8217;m good. I already said that.<br />
FEMALE: I don&#8217;t think you did.</p>
<p>These are two instances of the same program. Note that they started off saying exactly the same thing, and then started to converse. But what happened here? Why do they disagree? I can only imagine three explanations:</p>
<p>a) The Male instance &#8220;understands&#8221; that &#8220;Great&#8221; and &#8220;Good&#8221; are synonymous in this context, but the Female instance does not. Why? [And yeah, the two terms are not strictly synonyms, but still. If someone says "I feel good" it makes sense to ask "But do you feel great?" However, if someone says "I feel great" it makes no sense to ask "do you feel good?"]</p>
<p>b) Neither instance equates &#8220;Great&#8221; and &#8220;Good&#8221; in context. The chatbot throws in &#8220;I already said that&#8221; at random, and it happened to fit when the male said it.</p>
<p>c) The chatbot will sometimes &#8220;forget&#8221; a part of the conversation previously made.</p>
<p>Not knowing anything about how they&#8217;re programmed, I really have no idea. But isn&#8217;t it neat that two identically programmed chatbots will disagree about the contents of their own conversation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lowest cost Android tablet on the market by Mark Urbin</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/03/27/lowest-cost-android-tablet-on-the-market/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Urbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=483#comment-683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are a wise man, sir.  I did end up installing Cyanogenmod 7.  It does seem slightly confused that the Nook isn&#039;t actually a cellular phone sometimes, but that just may because I haven&#039;t upgraded Cyanogenmod lately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a wise man, sir.  I did end up installing Cyanogenmod 7.  It does seem slightly confused that the Nook isn&#8217;t actually a cellular phone sometimes, but that just may because I haven&#8217;t upgraded Cyanogenmod lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lowest cost Android tablet on the market by HTRN</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/03/27/lowest-cost-android-tablet-on-the-market/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HTRN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=483#comment-681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A more radical option than rooting is installing Cyanogenmod. They have versions for the Nook, including 7, which is a modifed version of Gingerbread(Android 2.3). Supposedly it runs better than factory firmware, as it isn&#039;t crippled with unnecessary crap like the OEMs use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more radical option than rooting is installing Cyanogenmod. They have versions for the Nook, including 7, which is a modifed version of Gingerbread(Android 2.3). Supposedly it runs better than factory firmware, as it isn&#8217;t crippled with unnecessary crap like the OEMs use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lowest cost Android tablet on the market by John Nowak</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/03/27/lowest-cost-android-tablet-on-the-market/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Nowak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=483#comment-676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if this is related -- B&amp;N have announced some changes to the Nook to make it more tablet-like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this is related &#8212; B&amp;N have announced some changes to the Nook to make it more tablet-like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lowest cost Android tablet on the market by John Nowak</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2011/03/27/lowest-cost-android-tablet-on-the-market/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Nowak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=483#comment-675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m giving some thought to getting a Xoom. Thing is that I want Bluetooth...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m giving some thought to getting a Xoom. Thing is that I want Bluetooth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Nuclear Power comeback by Mark Urbin</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2009/03/30/a-nuclear-power-comeback/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Urbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=272#comment-672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t take long for the watermelons to come out of the woodwork.

Let&#039;s review the facts of the matter, the nuclear power plant safety systems *survived the 8.9 magnitude earthquake*. 

That is worth repeating.  The nuclear power plant safety systems still functioned after a 8.9 magnitude earthquake. 

It took an 8.9 magnitude earthquake, closely followed by a major tsunami to take them out.

Meanwhile, in California, dozens of people are killed by a natural gas explosion because the gas company can&#039;t keep track of the type of pipe they have buried.

Avoid building your nuclear power plants on a coastal fault line (which really isn&#039;t much of an option for Japan) and you are good to go.

A natural gas powered electrical station subject to an 8.9 magnitude earthquake and a major tsunami would still be burning.  A coal fired plant would be a very large crater with a very large death toll.  Coal dust is more dangerous than gasoline fumes and there are large amounts of that easy to set off material present.

That Japanese nuclear plants have only vented radioactive steam 48 hours after the double hit of a 8.9 magnitude earth quake and a major tsunami is credit to the builders and the teams working to keep them contained.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t take long for the watermelons to come out of the woodwork.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s review the facts of the matter, the nuclear power plant safety systems *survived the 8.9 magnitude earthquake*. </p>
<p>That is worth repeating.  The nuclear power plant safety systems still functioned after a 8.9 magnitude earthquake. </p>
<p>It took an 8.9 magnitude earthquake, closely followed by a major tsunami to take them out.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in California, dozens of people are killed by a natural gas explosion because the gas company can&#8217;t keep track of the type of pipe they have buried.</p>
<p>Avoid building your nuclear power plants on a coastal fault line (which really isn&#8217;t much of an option for Japan) and you are good to go.</p>
<p>A natural gas powered electrical station subject to an 8.9 magnitude earthquake and a major tsunami would still be burning.  A coal fired plant would be a very large crater with a very large death toll.  Coal dust is more dangerous than gasoline fumes and there are large amounts of that easy to set off material present.</p>
<p>That Japanese nuclear plants have only vented radioactive steam 48 hours after the double hit of a 8.9 magnitude earth quake and a major tsunami is credit to the builders and the teams working to keep them contained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Nuclear Power comeback by southwerk</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2009/03/30/a-nuclear-power-comeback/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southwerk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 18:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=272#comment-671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you should rethink the whole article?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20042410-503543.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should rethink the whole article?<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20042410-503543.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20042410-503543.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50 Free Apps by Mark Urbin</title>
		<link>http://urbintechnology.com/2010/11/28/50-free-apps/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Urbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbintechnology.com/?p=456#comment-670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still say that Apple intentionality leaves bugs in the PC version.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say that Apple intentionality leaves bugs in the PC version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

